Let me set my stall out first. At home I use an iMac, and for work I use a Windows-based laptop (previous job and new job). I tried a few times to get into Linux, and while I quite liked the operating system itself, some key applications were either flaky or missing, and I always ended up back in Windows. As I’ve mentioned a few times, for a number of weeks I had possession of an iPad but barely used it. I heard from some people that they were taking an iPad with them on business appointments and leaving the laptop at home – even though I liked the idea, I don’t think there was ever an occasion where I could have done that. Because I used to monitor my business online and upgrading the system every time with this site https://www.webdesign499.com/web-design-ocean-ridge/.
In defence of the iPad, and of the Android tablets I’ve played with, there’s a lot of functionality and applications. Yes, they have their limitations, but they’re tablets – I don’t believe that they’re supposed to be personal computer / laptop replacements. Not yet anyway.
So here’s my issue… if you’re going to purchase something that has the form-factor of a laptop, why wouldn’t you buy a laptop that features a tried-and-trusted operating system with lots of available applications and that provides all of the support you need as a computer user (stuff like printing for example)? Or to turn the question around, why would you buy a Chromebook? If users are going to make that leap, there has to be something really compelling on offer.
A lower price maybe? Well, there’s a slew of cheap tablets on the market, but that hasn’t dented Apple’s dominance. But that’s an irrelevant fact – one of the first Chromebooks to enter the UK market (provided by Samsung) is expected to start at £349, and I could easily get a Windows 7-based laptop for that price (and cheaper).
A lightweight OS which boots up in seconds? Now this is attractive. However, Windows 7 and Mac OS X will come out of sleep mode in the same time, so unless the computer has been shut down this isn’t much of a compelling capability. One benefit of that lightweight OS, with it’s reduced CPU utilisation and hard disk access, will be realised in terms of battery life… and that’s important for the mobile user.
I think the major gotchas will be the following:
- You have to be on-line – with almost no off-line capability I think Google are making a massive assumption about always-available Internet access
- Printing – Google Cloud Print sounds like a major headache (but I’m willing to be told that it’s quick, easy and convenient)
- Applications – I should say “lack of” applications, and therefore lack of access to their data… oh, I’m on an aeroplane but want to write a document / review a spreadsheet / create a presentation
If you’re someone who can afford to have a device for every occasion, then I can see a Chromebook nicely fitting into the scenario where you need long battery life, a simple speedy user interface based mainly around web access, and all of your data in the cloud without having to worry about managing the data locally (and where you’re permanently connected to the Internet). But most people need more than that, so a Chromebook couldn’t be their only option. Sorry Google, I don’t get it. And if I’m being a bit obtuse, let’s just say I don’t think I’ll ever fit into that category.