<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/</link>
	<description>Not as funny as it used to be, according to Mrs A</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:15:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/#comment-391</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately I have to rely on our PR people - I&#039;m not permitted to make any approach to a journalist without going thru them. The campaign down that path is ongoing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately I have to rely on our PR people &#8211; I&#8217;m not permitted to make any approach to a journalist without going thru them. The campaign down that path is ongoing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve C.</title>
		<link>http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Instead of approaching Auntie directly, why not try to coach individual journalists responsible for those pieces? I tried this approach when I found it too much reading a piece on the 2004 US presidential election too much (too many Bush/Republican talking points). I got a polite email back from the journalist responsible thanking me. Not sure how much good it did... But the personal, reasoned approach can also work.

Think of it, how would an approach to big blue work? Where would that get to, as opposed to comments directed at you or Ed Brill...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of approaching Auntie directly, why not try to coach individual journalists responsible for those pieces? I tried this approach when I found it too much reading a piece on the 2004 US presidential election too much (too many Bush/Republican talking points). I got a polite email back from the journalist responsible thanking me. Not sure how much good it did&#8230; But the personal, reasoned approach can also work.</p>
<p>Think of it, how would an approach to big blue work? Where would that get to, as opposed to comments directed at you or Ed Brill&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/#comment-382</guid>
		<description>I have to say in Microsoft&#039;s defence that the touch screen thing (Surface) is pretty cool, and actually VERY cool when the phone goes on the table and the surface recognises it. But then you have to ask yourself, who did they nick that idea from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say in Microsoft&#8217;s defence that the touch screen thing (Surface) is pretty cool, and actually VERY cool when the phone goes on the table and the surface recognises it. But then you have to ask yourself, who did they nick that idea from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/#comment-378</guid>
		<description>I see part of the Bill interview was on BBC News last night...again.  While he was demonstrating that horrendous touch screen thing I was just urging it to blue screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see part of the Bill interview was on BBC News last night&#8230;again.  While he was demonstrating that horrendous touch screen thing I was just urging it to blue screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Very much agree. BBC Morning TV had an item on this morning about the Bill interview which boiled down to &quot;fall to your knees, the great man approaches&quot;. 

Now I would pay double my licence fee to see a well-briefed Jeremy Paxman give Bill a real interview.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very much agree. BBC Morning TV had an item on this morning about the Bill interview which boiled down to &#8220;fall to your knees, the great man approaches&#8221;. </p>
<p>Now I would pay double my licence fee to see a well-briefed Jeremy Paxman give Bill a real interview.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>It would seem that a lot of other people feel the same way:

&quot;Perhaps much because Gates had to be idolised as the Great Software Magician which he most likely is not&quot;

&quot;Instead of toadying up to Gates, as usual...&quot;

&quot;So Vista has sold 100 million licenses. But how many of those were actually chosen by the purchasers? It&#039;s virtually impossible to buy a computer that doesn&#039;t have Vista installed. Given a choice between XP and Vista I suggest that most PC-literates would choose XP. I&#039;m going to start looking at Linux.&quot;

&quot;Windows users believe the next version of Windows will fix all the problems they have faced with the current release, only to be disappointed time and again.&quot;

&quot;I doubt that Bill has a lot to laugh about. The iPhone seems to be quite well recieved and is selling well. Vista on the other hand...&quot;

Check it out...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2008/01/bill_gates_you_asked_the_quest_1.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would seem that a lot of other people feel the same way:</p>
<p>&#8220;Perhaps much because Gates had to be idolised as the Great Software Magician which he most likely is not&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Instead of toadying up to Gates, as usual&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;So Vista has sold 100 million licenses. But how many of those were actually chosen by the purchasers? It&#8217;s virtually impossible to buy a computer that doesn&#8217;t have Vista installed. Given a choice between XP and Vista I suggest that most PC-literates would choose XP. I&#8217;m going to start looking at Linux.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Windows users believe the next version of Windows will fix all the problems they have faced with the current release, only to be disappointed time and again.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I doubt that Bill has a lot to laugh about. The iPhone seems to be quite well recieved and is selling well. Vista on the other hand&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Check it out&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2008/01/bill_gates_you_asked_the_quest_1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2008/01/bill_gates_you_asked_the_quest_1.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/#comment-367</guid>
		<description>I seem to remember that Pete had a pop at the Beeb a while back and even wrote to them.  I think the response he got back was pretty poor.
I&#039;ve even emailed them about it on a couple of occasions and asked why they&#039;re so obsessed with Microsoft - and are they lining their pockets.  As you can imagine, I didn&#039;t get a particularly good response.  So I gave up.  If it annoys me, there&#039;s always Sky News.  They&#039;ll report on anything. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to remember that Pete had a pop at the Beeb a while back and even wrote to them.  I think the response he got back was pretty poor.<br />
I&#8217;ve even emailed them about it on a couple of occasions and asked why they&#8217;re so obsessed with Microsoft &#8211; and are they lining their pockets.  As you can imagine, I didn&#8217;t get a particularly good response.  So I gave up.  If it annoys me, there&#8217;s always Sky News.  They&#8217;ll report on anything. <img src='http://www.dadams.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/#comment-365</guid>
		<description>Ports, I understand the BBC&#039;s rationale about what they choose to focus on, but that doesn&#039;t mean I have to like it. I&#039;m not going to say too much here because I&#039;ve been having (heated) discussions with our PR people about how to solve the issue and improve our representation.

The impression people get that Microsoft are the one-and-only great innovator will only continue with stuff like this... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7174333.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ports, I understand the BBC&#8217;s rationale about what they choose to focus on, but that doesn&#8217;t mean I have to like it. I&#8217;m not going to say too much here because I&#8217;ve been having (heated) discussions with our PR people about how to solve the issue and improve our representation.</p>
<p>The impression people get that Microsoft are the one-and-only great innovator will only continue with stuff like this&#8230; <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7174333.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7174333.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ports</title>
		<link>http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Ports</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/#comment-364</guid>
		<description>I think it sucks too. But let&#039;s get real. Arsenal gets more coverage than Brentford. It&#039;s just life. The BBC is not Slashdot or The Register. They report what they consider to be of interest to their basically non-technical audience. 

We shouldn&#039;t shoot them, we should educate them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it sucks too. But let&#8217;s get real. Arsenal gets more coverage than Brentford. It&#8217;s just life. The BBC is not Slashdot or The Register. They report what they consider to be of interest to their basically non-technical audience. </p>
<p>We shouldn&#8217;t shoot them, we should educate them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Woodward</title>
		<link>http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Woodward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dadams.co.uk/2008/01/02/ask-bill/#comment-362</guid>
		<description>Here here. The BBC tech news is SO Micrsoft-centric it&#039;s ridiculous. 

If you want to do things properly, as per Stuart&#039;s suggestion, these might be good places to start ...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/contact/index.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/running/executive/
I&#039;ll email you separately with some other suggestions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here here. The BBC tech news is SO Micrsoft-centric it&#8217;s ridiculous. </p>
<p>If you want to do things properly, as per Stuart&#8217;s suggestion, these might be good places to start &#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/contact/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/contact/index.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/running/executive/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/running/executive/</a><br />
I&#8217;ll email you separately with some other suggestions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
